Dance of the Dwarfs

Krueger 60 A and B 

Krueger 60 A and B 

 I began observing and recording the position angle of Krueger 60 A and B also
called ADS15972 during the fall of 1978. In another 15.5 years I will have
observed these close orbiting red dwarf binary stars through one complete orbit.
This pair of stars also demonstrates an annual proper motion westward of nearly a
second of arc. Both of these stars are M class and are among the 40 nearest stars
to earth at just 13.1 light years. The current separation between the pair is 2.3”
of arc. In actual measurement the components are 9.2 AU apart which is about the
distance between the Sun and Saturn. The smaller component B is less than 10% the
mass of our sun and is famous for its irregular flare outbursts which can last for
10 minutes as the brightness doubles. The A component star is magnitude 9.8 and
the B component glows at magnitude 11.3. Both stars are in the constellation of
Cepheus about 45 minutes of arc from Delta Cephei which is famous as the prototype
for all Cepheid
 variable stars.
  
  Sketching:
  
  Date and Time: 9-23-2007, 5:10-5:45 UT
  Scope: 10” f/5.7 Dobsonian.  12mm eyepiece 121x
  8”x12” white sketching paper, B, 2B graphite pencils, scanned and inverted, star
  brightness adjustments using Paint
  Averted vision was a very useful aid in this sketch.
  Seeing: Pickering 8/10
  Transparency: above average 4/5
  Nelm: 4.8
  
  Frank McCabe

A Jovial Pair

Jupiter Pair 

This sketch was done on Rite in the Rain paper with a number 2 pencil.  I used the
edge of my eraser shield for the bands and blending was done with my finger.

An Orion ED80 was used on an LXD75 mount, all of which were on antivibration pads in
the observatory.  The eyepiece was a Zhumell 21-7mm zoom with a WO dielectric
diagnoal

Erika Rix
Zanesville, Ohio

Albireo under a blazing full Moon

Albireo 

I’ve never tried sketching doubles before. But the sunset was so pure that I wanted
to enjoy the night outdoors. Sketching Albireo seemed a nice plan under a moonlit
sky. While the full moon was rising from the East, I was covered by the shadow of
our house. I did not expect much to see in the field of view, only a little double
star. But much to my surprise the field was full of little sparks. I guess my
telescopic LM was about mag 11.5 at x63. The nelm was about mag 4.5 under a dark
blue sky. Even the telescopic sky appeared blue to me. I tried not to overdo the
colors. I have a hard time detecting colors in stars. So here is my little sketch of
Albireo. I hope you like it. (edit: the sketch has been reworked, once Sheliak was
finished. This to adapt the relation in brightness a bit.)

Date : August 29, 2007
Time : 21.00UT
Scope : Skywatcher 102/500
Vixen LV zoom at 8mm
Power : x62
FOV: 50′
Filter : none
Seeing : 3.5/5
Transp. : 2/5
Nelm : 4.5
Sketch Orientation : N up, W right.
Digital sketch made with PhotoPaint, based on a raw pencil sketch.
Rony De Laet

http://www.geocities.com/rodelaet

Sphere of Influence

M13 

M13 – Globular Cluster

This was both a tough one and a fun one that presented some unique challenges. At
one time, I had a total of 21 layers and two separate documents in PhotoShop just to
get this thing looking halfway decent. My first challenge was, of course, the
Globular itself. I took notes to share some of the steps involved in digitizing this
sketch to share with others here.

Globular:

I started with a copy of my scanned image and reduced the opacity to 30 percent.
This allowed me to see the sketched image while making it transparent enough to see
the black background of the background layer.

I then created another layer behind the sketched image layer, chose the elliptical
selection tool and made a circle approximately ¾ the diameter of the globular
cluster, and filled it with 100 percent white. I then made a copy of this layer and
hid it for the time being. I then applied a Gaussian Blur of 9.7 to the first white
circle to soften it and create a glow. The opacity of the layer was then reduced to
30 percent to achieve a bright but subtle glow. I then used the blur tool with a
brush size of approximately 150, centered it over the blurred white circle, and
blurred the image a couple of times to get the proper effect.

I then made the copied white circle layer visible and applied a series of splatter
brush strokes to fill in the center of the globular. I’d make a brush stroke, copy
the layer, and rotated it 90°. I then applied another splatter brush; copied and
rotated until I got the star-scatter that closely resembled my original sketch. I
used the eraser tool quite a bit to get rid of stray or out-of-place stars.

I then created another layer and, using the paintbrush tool, used a variety of brush
sizes from 1-4 to add the stars immediately surrounding the Globular. The opacity
was changed from anywhere to 25 percent to 50 percent depending on the particular
stars or series of stars I was recreating and to create a bright, but not too bright
look to the stars.

I copied the above layer and set the opacity to 60 percent and set the layer mode to
difference. This softened the edges while maintaining a bright core to the stars.

Background Stars:

This is where the fun (and time) began. As many of the fainter stars were seen with
diverted (averted) vision, I had to create a way to try and make the stars appear as
I actually saw them. A weird combination of bright, but not so bright as to be
blinding, yet dim enough that it takes a second look to see them.

Once again, I started with the paintbrush tool set to a diameter of between 1 and 3,
and placed the stars as they appear in my original sketch. (Remember, the original
sketch is still visible on its own layer, just at a reduced opacity) The opacity of
these background stars never exceeded 60 percent. I tried to increase the opacity,
but then the stars started to look artificial.and definitely not how I actually saw
them.

I actually created 3 separate layers for this. One for a brush size of 1, another
for a brush size of 2, and the last for the brush size of 3. This way I could
control the opacity of the separate size/dimness of the stars separately without
effecting the entire digital star-field.

Once I had all my background stars in place, I linked the 3 layers, merged them
together, and made a copy. This made them stand out a little more, but still a
little too artificial, so I set the layer to overlay mode, and reduced the opacity
to 56 percent. I then merged all the background star layers, the globular layer, and
the blurred layer together. I then made a copy of this master layer.

I opened a new document in PhotoShop, and pasted the copied layer. I reversed the
image to a negative. Using the color picker, I removed all the white background,
leaving me with just the black reversed stars and Globular.

I then dragged and dropped this layer back into my original document. A quick Ctrl
+A+X+V cut and centered this negative image exactly over the original image. I then
moved the negative image behind the original, and applied a Gaussian Blur of 2.5.
This helped to darken the area behind the original stars and created a warm glow.

At this time, all layers except the black background layer were merged. I then used
the blur tool to soften those stars that still appeared too bright, as well as
utilizing the Burn and Dodge tools to adjust brightness as needed.

The result of all this is my digitized version of M13 based on my original sketch.
The original sketch took me about 30 minutes, and the digitized reproduction took me
roughly 30+ minutes. This has so far proven to be my most involved sketch and
digitized reproduction.
I hope it is acceptable.

Wade V. Corbeil

The Other Double Double in Lyra

Double-Double 

  Last evening I was out observing with a telescope and thinking about how another
summer is ending and the fall season is upon us. With the exception of the month
of August which was mostly cloudy and rainy, the summer here was a good one for
observing. The first three weeks of September has been a welcome return to the
good observing nights like I experienced in June and July. At a public open
viewing night this past Friday I was showing the attendees the famous double
double ( Epsilon 1and 2 Lyrae). At the end of the evening I realized I had
forgotten to show them the other double double in eastern Lyra with the wider
separation and nearly parallel components rather than perpendicular as with
epsilon 1 and 2. I have never sketched this combination of double stars so I
decided to do just that and maybe next time I won’t forget to point out this view.
I am not a binocular observer but these stars would I am sure look great and split
nicely in a pair of astronomical  binoculars. The northern pair of stars are designated
Struve 2470 they are both white stars at magnitudes 6.6 and 8.6 at a position angle
of 271°. The separation of this pair is 13.4” of arc. The other double pair 11 minutes
to the south is Struve 2474; this pair of pale yellow stars glow at magnitude 6.7 and 8.7.
they are separated by 16” of arc and are in position angle 262°. This is the way they
looked to me at the telescope eyepiece. These stars are about 19hrs. 9min.
Right Ascensionand +34° 40min Declination. Both pair fit nicely in one field of
view and are easy to split.
  
  Sketching:
  
  Date and Time: 9-20-2007, 2:25-2:50 UT
  Scope: 10” f/5.7 Dobsonian. 21mm eyepiece 70x
  8”x12” white sketching paper, B, 2B graphite pencils, scanned and inverted, star
  brightness adjustment using Paint
  Seeing: Pickering 7/10
  Transparency: above average 3/5
  Nelm: 4.5
  
  Frank McCabe

Sweet stellar spoonful

M15

Dear Skycombers,
   
  Messier 15 is a splendid globular cluster, granulation is fine when compared to
Messier 13 and Messier 5 ‘Salt rather than Sugar’. It is, I hope you agree a
beguiling spectacle, a veritable stellar cornucopia no less.
  
  Drawn with graphite pencil on white cartridge paper and converted to negative post
scanning without enhancement.
  
  7.9.2007,  22:40UT
   Location: Chippingdale observatory, Nr Buntingford, Hertfordshire, UK
  14″ F5 Newtonian at 118x giving a 0’35” FOV
  Seeing Ant 11-111 transparency was good.
  
  Dale Holt

A Capacity for Opacity

Ha Sun 

2007 08 26, 1700-1928 UT

PCW Memorial Observatory, Zanesville, Ohio

Equipment used:

Internally Double stacked Maxscope 60mm, WO Binoviewers, 20mm WO EP’s, LXD75.

Meade ETX70-AT, 21-7mm Zhumell, glass white light filter.

Seeing above average with only a few moments of quivering, transparency above average.

Temps 80.1 °F / 26.7 °C to 78.1 °F / 25.6 °C over course of observation.

Winds 4.6 mph – 6.9mph NNE/ 11.1 km/h.

Clear progressing to mostly cloudy by the end of the session.

Humidity 54%

Sketching media: The white light sketch was done on copy paper with a number 2 pencil.

The Ha sketch color sketch was done using black strathmore paper with color Prang pencils.
 

Word for the day:  Opacity

According to my heavy, red, weathered Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (tenth
edition), opacity is defined as:

“n, .1: the quality or state of a body that makes it impervious to the rays of
light; broadly: the relative capacity of matter to obstruct the transmission of
radiant energy..2b: the quality or state of being mentally obtuse: Dullness.”

I kind of got a kick out this.  It appears that with one word, I can attempt to
discuss opacity of the Sun and yet at the same time try not to create opacity while
doing it.

Studying the Sun, as well as anything worthwhile, can be very confusing and
sometimes overwhelming.  It helps to understand the basics such as knowing that the
Sun is a giant ball of gas.  It has several layers starting at the inner most called
the core. The majority of the Sun’s core consists of hydrogen.  By nuclear fusion,
the hydrogen is converted into helium.  The key here is that in doing so, energy is
created. Energy equals heat.  All in all, when we think of the Sun, we think of
radiation, or electromagnetic radiation to be more specific.  Radiation is a process
that transports energy.  Electromagnetic radiation is a radiation that carries
energy through empty space by means of waves at the speed of light. 

You see, atomic particles (created by the nuclear reactions in the core) speed up
and grow from the exchange of varying flows of electrical and magnetic fields, which
is where electromagnetic radiation originates.  Following me so far?  Here’s where I
start to get back on topic.  Electromagnetic radiation has both wavelength and
frequency.  When you multiply the two together, you get the velocity of light.  If
one of the variables increases, the other has to decrease for the velocity of light
to stay constant.

Oh, how easily it would be to dive in further with all this.  But I need to stay on
track with the first definition of opacity.  Wavelengths are compiled in what we
call a spectrum.  And this is when we get into means possible for us to view the
Sun. 

Imagine the energy being transported through a few more layers of the Sun, each
layer quite a bit hotter than the previous as it extends away from the core.  We
finally reach the layer that most call the “surface” of the Sun, the Photosphere.
Does that look Greek to you?  Well, not to worry.  It is Greek.  The Greek word
“phot” stands for light and “sphere” of course stands for round ball. 

In the photosphere, the gas is heated so much that it burns bright giving off most
of its energy close to the middle of the spectrum, creating visible light.  And it
doesn’t end there.  Reaching out from that thin layer of burning gas is the
chromosphere, meaning round ball of color.  After a brief pass through the
transition region, the energy enters the corona and then outwards as solar wind.
Each layer is visible through specialized means.  Each layer involves our word for
the day, opacity.

One evening, quite a few years back, my brother in law and I were cooking supper
together. I was in charge of the chip pan and cutting up the potatoes.  I could see
him very clearly across the room and the air was transparent and had a zero optical
thickness.

As we were talking to each other from different ends of the kitchen, we soon noticed
that we were getting harder for the other to see. In other words, the optical
thickness was getting thicker.  By the time we became alarmed to this fact, the
smoke was nearly opaque with an optical thickness of close to 9.  I could hardly see
him anymore.  As he walked toward me, I could see him more clearly and by the time
he reached me the optical thickness was perhaps a 3.

We removed the smoking chip pan that caused the smoke from the stove, opened the
kitchen windows, grabbed the dog and a bottle of wine, and sat out on the steps of
the flat, watching the smoke roll out of the kitchen window.  I don’t recall what we
ever did for supper that night, but I suppose that’s beside the point. It was a
perfect example of opacity and how I measured it. The same is done when viewing the
Sun.

The further into the Sun we look, the higher the opacity. We can only see up to
approximately an optical thickness of between 0.5 and 2.  The photosphere is said to
have an optical thickness range of close to 3/4, and it includes all the light that
we can muster from the Sun, meaning white light.  If I wanted to view through a
narrowband filter such as a hydrogen alpha filter, the optimal optical thickness
would be reached before I even gazed into the Sun as far as the photosphere.  I
would in fact start at the Chromosphere.  This is wonderful news for us in that by
using special filters, it changes the opacity from a zero to us being able to
actually see the color of the light in this layer of gas, blocking out all the other
colors that would have hidden this color otherwise.

Well now, I’ve come full circle with opacity!  And what does this have to do with my
observations today?  Well everything to be honest.  Opacity is what strives us to
find new filters for trying to tease out as much detail as we can.  And there’s
information to be had if we can look at different layers of the sun.  In my
observations today, I viewed in both the photosphere and the chromosphere.  Two
different gas layers with a temperature difference of over 4000 degrees Kelvin
(chromosphere at 10,000 K and photosphere at 5780 K).  Each will allow us to see
slightly different details on the Sun and each are important to consider while
studying it.

This first observation was recorded in hydrogen alpha.  You can see the effects of
the magnetic fields through the long fingers of the filaments holding the cooled
dense gas in place.  Although this observation is mainly in the chromosphere and
lower parts of the corona, the filaments are generally held in place by regions of
opposing magnetic polarity within the photosphere.  Of course this is also the case
for the prominences, as prominences are filaments above the limb where the gas is
set in front of the black sky instead of the disk.  Although the filaments were very
impressive on the disk itself, they were not so impressive on the limb today.
Having said that, take a look at the faint section of prominence that appears to be
floating off the limb in the WNW region.

NOAA 10969’s plage intertwined and reached out with crooked fingers. 

White light 

The next observation was using a white light filter where over 99.999% of the Sun’s
light is blocked out, making it possible for me to view the photosphere.  This is
called white light.  You can see NOAA 10969 in the cooler layer.  The chromosphere
becomes invisible to me again.  The two dark sections of umbrae within the penumbra
of this action region were very prominent.  I could see a darkened outline of the
penumbra and it had an almost rectangular shape with curved corners.  Of particular
interest was the very faint darkened area to the right of the sunspot.  This happens
to me fairly often, seeing little bonus features like this.  I’m still not sure what
causes it.  Normally I would think it was contrast from faculae that I was unable to
discern.  Normally we can only see faculae closer to the darker limb regions. But
often I can see an outline of contrast suggesting faculae present when the active
region is toward the center of the disk.

This time it is a little different.  If I didn’t know any better, it looked like a
thick triangular cooler region next to the sunspot.  By this I mean cooler than the
photosphere, hotter than the umbra, and only just slightly hotter than the
penumbrae.

With so much to learn concerning the sun, at least we learned one new word.  It’s a
start in the right direction anyway. 

Erika Rix

Between the King and the Swan

NGC 6946 
Object Name: NGC 6946 (H.IV.76)

Object Type: Spiral Galaxy

Constellation: Cepheus

Right Ascension (2000.0): 20h 34.8m

Declination (2000.0): +60° 09′

Magnitude: 8.9

Dimensions: 11.5′ x 9.8′

Hubble Class: Sc

Telescope: Parks Astrolight EQ6 • 6″ f/6 Newtonian Reflector

Eyepiece: 7.5mm Parks Gold Series Plössl • 120x, 26′ FoV

Date & Time: 8 September 2007 • 04:15 UT

Seeing Conditions: NELM 6.3 • Pickering 8

Observing Location: Cuyamaca Mts., San Diego Co., California

NGC 6946 is a large face-on spiral galaxy on the Cepheus-Cygnus border.  The
constellation boundary runs north-south right through the center of the galaxy.
Most references and guidebooks place NGC 6946 in the constellation Cepheus, but
occasionally it will be listed in Cygnus (as is the case with Luginbuhl & Skiff’s
Observing Handbook and Catalogue of Deep-Sky Objects).  This galaxy is notable for
its proximity to open cluster NGC 6939 and the frequency with which it produces
supernovae (eight in the last century).  Like several other bright, nearby galaxies,
astronomers once considered NGC 6946 a possible member of the Local Group.  It is
now known to be a member of the Coma-Sculptor Cloud and is one of the nearest spiral
galaxies beyond the Local Group at a distance of 15 million light-years.

To locate this low-surface brightness spiral (its light is dimmed by about 1.6
magnitudes by it’s proximity to the plane of the Milky Way), center your scope on
3rd magnitude Eta (η) Cephei and look for the twin glows of NGC 6939 and NGC 6946
about 2° to the southwest.  The galaxy is the fainter of the two and lies 38′
southeast of the cluster.  At 30x magnification NGC 6946 appears as a subtle glow of
soft gray nebulosity in a rich star field, brighter toward the center with a poorly
defined perimeter.

Increasing the magnification reveals a very faint stellar nucleus embedded in a
moderately bright core, elongated north-south with a little counter-clockwise twist
at each end.  Surrounding the core is a slightly elliptical ring of nebulosity,
elongated northeast-southwest, but brighter on the northwest and southeast sides.
Beyond this ring, things start getting a little difficult.  Delicate strands of
nebulosity (spiral arm fragments) reveal themselves intermittently with averted
vision.

NGC 6946 was discovered on September 9, 1798 by William Herschel using his 18.7-inch
reflector; he classified it as a planetary nebula.

Eric Graff

Two in the midst of hundreds

Delta Lyrae and Stephenson 1 

Delta Lyrae, Stephenson 1

A drawing of a double star that was supposed to be a walk in the park turned out to
be a lot more challenging. This moonless night was filled with plenty of stars. So
was the field of view around Delta Lyrae. Countless milkyway stars were scattered
like pinpricks in the sky. Leaving them out of the sketch was no option. I also read
that Delta Lyrae is part of a sparse little cluster called Stephenson 1. I had a
hard time to recognise the grouping as a cluster. Here is the sketch.

Date : September 4, 2007
Time : 21.00UT
Scope : Skywatcher 102/500
Meade 4000 SP 26mm
Power : x20
FOV: 150′
Filter : none
Seeing : 3.5/5
Transp. : 3/5
Nelm : 5.3
Sketch Orientation : N up, W right.
Digital sketch made with PhotoPaint, based on a raw pencil sketch.
Rony De Laet

http://www.geocities.com/rodelaet