Sphere of Influence

M13 

M13 – Globular Cluster

This was both a tough one and a fun one that presented some unique challenges. At
one time, I had a total of 21 layers and two separate documents in PhotoShop just to
get this thing looking halfway decent. My first challenge was, of course, the
Globular itself. I took notes to share some of the steps involved in digitizing this
sketch to share with others here.

Globular:

I started with a copy of my scanned image and reduced the opacity to 30 percent.
This allowed me to see the sketched image while making it transparent enough to see
the black background of the background layer.

I then created another layer behind the sketched image layer, chose the elliptical
selection tool and made a circle approximately ¾ the diameter of the globular
cluster, and filled it with 100 percent white. I then made a copy of this layer and
hid it for the time being. I then applied a Gaussian Blur of 9.7 to the first white
circle to soften it and create a glow. The opacity of the layer was then reduced to
30 percent to achieve a bright but subtle glow. I then used the blur tool with a
brush size of approximately 150, centered it over the blurred white circle, and
blurred the image a couple of times to get the proper effect.

I then made the copied white circle layer visible and applied a series of splatter
brush strokes to fill in the center of the globular. I’d make a brush stroke, copy
the layer, and rotated it 90°. I then applied another splatter brush; copied and
rotated until I got the star-scatter that closely resembled my original sketch. I
used the eraser tool quite a bit to get rid of stray or out-of-place stars.

I then created another layer and, using the paintbrush tool, used a variety of brush
sizes from 1-4 to add the stars immediately surrounding the Globular. The opacity
was changed from anywhere to 25 percent to 50 percent depending on the particular
stars or series of stars I was recreating and to create a bright, but not too bright
look to the stars.

I copied the above layer and set the opacity to 60 percent and set the layer mode to
difference. This softened the edges while maintaining a bright core to the stars.

Background Stars:

This is where the fun (and time) began. As many of the fainter stars were seen with
diverted (averted) vision, I had to create a way to try and make the stars appear as
I actually saw them. A weird combination of bright, but not so bright as to be
blinding, yet dim enough that it takes a second look to see them.

Once again, I started with the paintbrush tool set to a diameter of between 1 and 3,
and placed the stars as they appear in my original sketch. (Remember, the original
sketch is still visible on its own layer, just at a reduced opacity) The opacity of
these background stars never exceeded 60 percent. I tried to increase the opacity,
but then the stars started to look artificial.and definitely not how I actually saw
them.

I actually created 3 separate layers for this. One for a brush size of 1, another
for a brush size of 2, and the last for the brush size of 3. This way I could
control the opacity of the separate size/dimness of the stars separately without
effecting the entire digital star-field.

Once I had all my background stars in place, I linked the 3 layers, merged them
together, and made a copy. This made them stand out a little more, but still a
little too artificial, so I set the layer to overlay mode, and reduced the opacity
to 56 percent. I then merged all the background star layers, the globular layer, and
the blurred layer together. I then made a copy of this master layer.

I opened a new document in PhotoShop, and pasted the copied layer. I reversed the
image to a negative. Using the color picker, I removed all the white background,
leaving me with just the black reversed stars and Globular.

I then dragged and dropped this layer back into my original document. A quick Ctrl
+A+X+V cut and centered this negative image exactly over the original image. I then
moved the negative image behind the original, and applied a Gaussian Blur of 2.5.
This helped to darken the area behind the original stars and created a warm glow.

At this time, all layers except the black background layer were merged. I then used
the blur tool to soften those stars that still appeared too bright, as well as
utilizing the Burn and Dodge tools to adjust brightness as needed.

The result of all this is my digitized version of M13 based on my original sketch.
The original sketch took me about 30 minutes, and the digitized reproduction took me
roughly 30+ minutes. This has so far proven to be my most involved sketch and
digitized reproduction.
I hope it is acceptable.

Wade V. Corbeil

The Other Double Double in Lyra

Double-Double 

  Last evening I was out observing with a telescope and thinking about how another
summer is ending and the fall season is upon us. With the exception of the month
of August which was mostly cloudy and rainy, the summer here was a good one for
observing. The first three weeks of September has been a welcome return to the
good observing nights like I experienced in June and July. At a public open
viewing night this past Friday I was showing the attendees the famous double
double ( Epsilon 1and 2 Lyrae). At the end of the evening I realized I had
forgotten to show them the other double double in eastern Lyra with the wider
separation and nearly parallel components rather than perpendicular as with
epsilon 1 and 2. I have never sketched this combination of double stars so I
decided to do just that and maybe next time I won’t forget to point out this view.
I am not a binocular observer but these stars would I am sure look great and split
nicely in a pair of astronomical  binoculars. The northern pair of stars are designated
Struve 2470 they are both white stars at magnitudes 6.6 and 8.6 at a position angle
of 271°. The separation of this pair is 13.4” of arc. The other double pair 11 minutes
to the south is Struve 2474; this pair of pale yellow stars glow at magnitude 6.7 and 8.7.
they are separated by 16” of arc and are in position angle 262°. This is the way they
looked to me at the telescope eyepiece. These stars are about 19hrs. 9min.
Right Ascensionand +34° 40min Declination. Both pair fit nicely in one field of
view and are easy to split.
  
  Sketching:
  
  Date and Time: 9-20-2007, 2:25-2:50 UT
  Scope: 10” f/5.7 Dobsonian. 21mm eyepiece 70x
  8”x12” white sketching paper, B, 2B graphite pencils, scanned and inverted, star
  brightness adjustment using Paint
  Seeing: Pickering 7/10
  Transparency: above average 3/5
  Nelm: 4.5
  
  Frank McCabe

Sweet stellar spoonful

M15

Dear Skycombers,
   
  Messier 15 is a splendid globular cluster, granulation is fine when compared to
Messier 13 and Messier 5 ‘Salt rather than Sugar’. It is, I hope you agree a
beguiling spectacle, a veritable stellar cornucopia no less.
  
  Drawn with graphite pencil on white cartridge paper and converted to negative post
scanning without enhancement.
  
  7.9.2007,  22:40UT
   Location: Chippingdale observatory, Nr Buntingford, Hertfordshire, UK
  14″ F5 Newtonian at 118x giving a 0’35” FOV
  Seeing Ant 11-111 transparency was good.
  
  Dale Holt

A Capacity for Opacity

Ha Sun 

2007 08 26, 1700-1928 UT

PCW Memorial Observatory, Zanesville, Ohio

Equipment used:

Internally Double stacked Maxscope 60mm, WO Binoviewers, 20mm WO EP’s, LXD75.

Meade ETX70-AT, 21-7mm Zhumell, glass white light filter.

Seeing above average with only a few moments of quivering, transparency above average.

Temps 80.1 °F / 26.7 °C to 78.1 °F / 25.6 °C over course of observation.

Winds 4.6 mph – 6.9mph NNE/ 11.1 km/h.

Clear progressing to mostly cloudy by the end of the session.

Humidity 54%

Sketching media: The white light sketch was done on copy paper with a number 2 pencil.

The Ha sketch color sketch was done using black strathmore paper with color Prang pencils.
 

Word for the day:  Opacity

According to my heavy, red, weathered Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (tenth
edition), opacity is defined as:

“n, .1: the quality or state of a body that makes it impervious to the rays of
light; broadly: the relative capacity of matter to obstruct the transmission of
radiant energy..2b: the quality or state of being mentally obtuse: Dullness.”

I kind of got a kick out this.  It appears that with one word, I can attempt to
discuss opacity of the Sun and yet at the same time try not to create opacity while
doing it.

Studying the Sun, as well as anything worthwhile, can be very confusing and
sometimes overwhelming.  It helps to understand the basics such as knowing that the
Sun is a giant ball of gas.  It has several layers starting at the inner most called
the core. The majority of the Sun’s core consists of hydrogen.  By nuclear fusion,
the hydrogen is converted into helium.  The key here is that in doing so, energy is
created. Energy equals heat.  All in all, when we think of the Sun, we think of
radiation, or electromagnetic radiation to be more specific.  Radiation is a process
that transports energy.  Electromagnetic radiation is a radiation that carries
energy through empty space by means of waves at the speed of light. 

You see, atomic particles (created by the nuclear reactions in the core) speed up
and grow from the exchange of varying flows of electrical and magnetic fields, which
is where electromagnetic radiation originates.  Following me so far?  Here’s where I
start to get back on topic.  Electromagnetic radiation has both wavelength and
frequency.  When you multiply the two together, you get the velocity of light.  If
one of the variables increases, the other has to decrease for the velocity of light
to stay constant.

Oh, how easily it would be to dive in further with all this.  But I need to stay on
track with the first definition of opacity.  Wavelengths are compiled in what we
call a spectrum.  And this is when we get into means possible for us to view the
Sun. 

Imagine the energy being transported through a few more layers of the Sun, each
layer quite a bit hotter than the previous as it extends away from the core.  We
finally reach the layer that most call the “surface” of the Sun, the Photosphere.
Does that look Greek to you?  Well, not to worry.  It is Greek.  The Greek word
“phot” stands for light and “sphere” of course stands for round ball. 

In the photosphere, the gas is heated so much that it burns bright giving off most
of its energy close to the middle of the spectrum, creating visible light.  And it
doesn’t end there.  Reaching out from that thin layer of burning gas is the
chromosphere, meaning round ball of color.  After a brief pass through the
transition region, the energy enters the corona and then outwards as solar wind.
Each layer is visible through specialized means.  Each layer involves our word for
the day, opacity.

One evening, quite a few years back, my brother in law and I were cooking supper
together. I was in charge of the chip pan and cutting up the potatoes.  I could see
him very clearly across the room and the air was transparent and had a zero optical
thickness.

As we were talking to each other from different ends of the kitchen, we soon noticed
that we were getting harder for the other to see. In other words, the optical
thickness was getting thicker.  By the time we became alarmed to this fact, the
smoke was nearly opaque with an optical thickness of close to 9.  I could hardly see
him anymore.  As he walked toward me, I could see him more clearly and by the time
he reached me the optical thickness was perhaps a 3.

We removed the smoking chip pan that caused the smoke from the stove, opened the
kitchen windows, grabbed the dog and a bottle of wine, and sat out on the steps of
the flat, watching the smoke roll out of the kitchen window.  I don’t recall what we
ever did for supper that night, but I suppose that’s beside the point. It was a
perfect example of opacity and how I measured it. The same is done when viewing the
Sun.

The further into the Sun we look, the higher the opacity. We can only see up to
approximately an optical thickness of between 0.5 and 2.  The photosphere is said to
have an optical thickness range of close to 3/4, and it includes all the light that
we can muster from the Sun, meaning white light.  If I wanted to view through a
narrowband filter such as a hydrogen alpha filter, the optimal optical thickness
would be reached before I even gazed into the Sun as far as the photosphere.  I
would in fact start at the Chromosphere.  This is wonderful news for us in that by
using special filters, it changes the opacity from a zero to us being able to
actually see the color of the light in this layer of gas, blocking out all the other
colors that would have hidden this color otherwise.

Well now, I’ve come full circle with opacity!  And what does this have to do with my
observations today?  Well everything to be honest.  Opacity is what strives us to
find new filters for trying to tease out as much detail as we can.  And there’s
information to be had if we can look at different layers of the sun.  In my
observations today, I viewed in both the photosphere and the chromosphere.  Two
different gas layers with a temperature difference of over 4000 degrees Kelvin
(chromosphere at 10,000 K and photosphere at 5780 K).  Each will allow us to see
slightly different details on the Sun and each are important to consider while
studying it.

This first observation was recorded in hydrogen alpha.  You can see the effects of
the magnetic fields through the long fingers of the filaments holding the cooled
dense gas in place.  Although this observation is mainly in the chromosphere and
lower parts of the corona, the filaments are generally held in place by regions of
opposing magnetic polarity within the photosphere.  Of course this is also the case
for the prominences, as prominences are filaments above the limb where the gas is
set in front of the black sky instead of the disk.  Although the filaments were very
impressive on the disk itself, they were not so impressive on the limb today.
Having said that, take a look at the faint section of prominence that appears to be
floating off the limb in the WNW region.

NOAA 10969’s plage intertwined and reached out with crooked fingers. 

White light 

The next observation was using a white light filter where over 99.999% of the Sun’s
light is blocked out, making it possible for me to view the photosphere.  This is
called white light.  You can see NOAA 10969 in the cooler layer.  The chromosphere
becomes invisible to me again.  The two dark sections of umbrae within the penumbra
of this action region were very prominent.  I could see a darkened outline of the
penumbra and it had an almost rectangular shape with curved corners.  Of particular
interest was the very faint darkened area to the right of the sunspot.  This happens
to me fairly often, seeing little bonus features like this.  I’m still not sure what
causes it.  Normally I would think it was contrast from faculae that I was unable to
discern.  Normally we can only see faculae closer to the darker limb regions. But
often I can see an outline of contrast suggesting faculae present when the active
region is toward the center of the disk.

This time it is a little different.  If I didn’t know any better, it looked like a
thick triangular cooler region next to the sunspot.  By this I mean cooler than the
photosphere, hotter than the umbra, and only just slightly hotter than the
penumbrae.

With so much to learn concerning the sun, at least we learned one new word.  It’s a
start in the right direction anyway. 

Erika Rix

Between the King and the Swan

NGC 6946 
Object Name: NGC 6946 (H.IV.76)

Object Type: Spiral Galaxy

Constellation: Cepheus

Right Ascension (2000.0): 20h 34.8m

Declination (2000.0): +60° 09′

Magnitude: 8.9

Dimensions: 11.5′ x 9.8′

Hubble Class: Sc

Telescope: Parks Astrolight EQ6 • 6″ f/6 Newtonian Reflector

Eyepiece: 7.5mm Parks Gold Series Plössl • 120x, 26′ FoV

Date & Time: 8 September 2007 • 04:15 UT

Seeing Conditions: NELM 6.3 • Pickering 8

Observing Location: Cuyamaca Mts., San Diego Co., California

NGC 6946 is a large face-on spiral galaxy on the Cepheus-Cygnus border.  The
constellation boundary runs north-south right through the center of the galaxy.
Most references and guidebooks place NGC 6946 in the constellation Cepheus, but
occasionally it will be listed in Cygnus (as is the case with Luginbuhl & Skiff’s
Observing Handbook and Catalogue of Deep-Sky Objects).  This galaxy is notable for
its proximity to open cluster NGC 6939 and the frequency with which it produces
supernovae (eight in the last century).  Like several other bright, nearby galaxies,
astronomers once considered NGC 6946 a possible member of the Local Group.  It is
now known to be a member of the Coma-Sculptor Cloud and is one of the nearest spiral
galaxies beyond the Local Group at a distance of 15 million light-years.

To locate this low-surface brightness spiral (its light is dimmed by about 1.6
magnitudes by it’s proximity to the plane of the Milky Way), center your scope on
3rd magnitude Eta (η) Cephei and look for the twin glows of NGC 6939 and NGC 6946
about 2° to the southwest.  The galaxy is the fainter of the two and lies 38′
southeast of the cluster.  At 30x magnification NGC 6946 appears as a subtle glow of
soft gray nebulosity in a rich star field, brighter toward the center with a poorly
defined perimeter.

Increasing the magnification reveals a very faint stellar nucleus embedded in a
moderately bright core, elongated north-south with a little counter-clockwise twist
at each end.  Surrounding the core is a slightly elliptical ring of nebulosity,
elongated northeast-southwest, but brighter on the northwest and southeast sides.
Beyond this ring, things start getting a little difficult.  Delicate strands of
nebulosity (spiral arm fragments) reveal themselves intermittently with averted
vision.

NGC 6946 was discovered on September 9, 1798 by William Herschel using his 18.7-inch
reflector; he classified it as a planetary nebula.

Eric Graff

Two in the midst of hundreds

Delta Lyrae and Stephenson 1 

Delta Lyrae, Stephenson 1

A drawing of a double star that was supposed to be a walk in the park turned out to
be a lot more challenging. This moonless night was filled with plenty of stars. So
was the field of view around Delta Lyrae. Countless milkyway stars were scattered
like pinpricks in the sky. Leaving them out of the sketch was no option. I also read
that Delta Lyrae is part of a sparse little cluster called Stephenson 1. I had a
hard time to recognise the grouping as a cluster. Here is the sketch.

Date : September 4, 2007
Time : 21.00UT
Scope : Skywatcher 102/500
Meade 4000 SP 26mm
Power : x20
FOV: 150′
Filter : none
Seeing : 3.5/5
Transp. : 3/5
Nelm : 5.3
Sketch Orientation : N up, W right.
Digital sketch made with PhotoPaint, based on a raw pencil sketch.
Rony De Laet

http://www.geocities.com/rodelaet

Brightest Galaxy in Pegasus

NGC 7331 

  With the high pressure dry air mass moving out of Canada into the Midwestern
United States, we had a cool clear night for observing the night sky. I chose for
sketching the brightest galaxy in the constellation of Pegasus NGC 7331. This Sb
galaxy called a nebula by William Herschel in the late 18th century is 10’ x 2’ in
size as seen in the sky.  This spiral galaxy is somewhere between 43-49 million
light years away and glows at magnitude 9.7. NGC 7331 has been compared to our
milky way in size, spiral structure and general appearance. There are a number of
other galaxies fainter than 13th magnitude in the same field of view but
undetectable under my urban sky conditions with a 10” scope.
  
  
  Sketching:
  
  Date and Time: 9-12-2007, 3:20-3:50 UT
  Scope: 10” f/5.7 Dobsonian. 21mm and 12mm eyepieces 70x and 121x
  8”x12” white sketching paper, B, 2B graphite pencils, scanned and inverted, star
  magnitude adjustments using Paint
  Seeing: Pickering 8/10
  Transparency: above average 4/5
  Nelm: 4.9
  
  Frank McCabe

Return to a Prominent Highland Beauty

Moretus 

2007 Sept 01, 0450-0631 UT

10″ LX200 with diagonal, 21-7mm Zhumell

PCW Memorial Observatory, Erika Rix

Temp: 57.9 °F / 14.4 °C

Humidity: 75%

Seeing Antoniadi II, Transparency 2/6

Sketch media:  Rite in the Rain paper, charcoal

Moretus
Lunation 19.24 d

81.4% Illumination

Lib. Lat: -04deg44′

Lib. Long: +01deg35′

Altitude 35deg

Colongitude 139.9deg

According to the Virtual Moon Atlas the dimension of Moretus is 117x117Km / 69x69Mi
and it’s from the Eratosthenian period (From -3.2 billions years to -1.1 billions
years).

I’m having fun with Moretus.  Chuck Wood wrote “Moretus is a very fresh but rayless
115-km-wide, 4-km-deep version of Tycho that would be a major attraction if it were
better placed.” (page 126, The Modern Moon, a Personal View).  He also brought up
Harold Hill and the measurement of the central peak of Moretus that Mr. Hill wrote
as being the highest of all the craters Earthside at 2.12km.  Chuck then measured it
using Lunar Orbiter photos and found it to be very comparable to Mr. Hill’s at
2.66km.

This led me look for Moretus in Harold Hill’s “A Portfolio of Lunar Drawings” and on
pages 122-123 I found not only a superb description of this crater, but two sketches
that were very similar in comparison to each other as my two sketches’ were to each
other.  The purpose of this report was to compare my sketch of 2007 September 01 to
that of 2006 October 30.  I was pleasantly surprised to be led to the same type of
report from Mr. Hill…”two 1966 drawings demonstrate how greatly the presentation
of this magnificent formation can alter under near extremes of libration in
latitude.”(page 122)

Here is the sketch from Oct 2006:

http://www.cloudynights.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=8052&password=&sort=2&thecat=500

The details for comparison are:

Lunation 7.8d

51.4% Illumination

Lib. Lat: +05deg39′

Lib. Long: -06deg08′

Altitude 26deg

Colongitude 7.4deg

Note in the earlier sketch that not only does Moretus look narrower, but Cysatus and
Curtius are completely hidden and Gruemberger looks completely invisible except for
the telltale crater within it, Gruemberger A. 

Now look at the Moretus sketch from the other day.  Everything has opened up,
Moretus, Short on the other side as well as the three craters on the Northern
borders (to the bottom in both sketches).

It’s easy to see how a person could get lost in the rugged terrain of the Southern
hemisphere and even more so, how difficult it would be to make accurate studies. An
example of this is the measurement of the central peak.  I’ll make no claims that I
could begin to measure the central peak myself.  But I thought I could see a
craterlet in my observation the night just plain as day on the southern rim of
Moretus towards Short.  In the sketch, you can even see the craterlet.  My
observation from Oct of 2006 does not include this.  I began to doubt myself on
whether this feature was actually there.  Thank goodness for Hill’s observation. He
confirmed this depression in the rim with his sketch done on 1966 Dec 4th, with a
higher percentage of illumination than his second sketch.

We already knew that repeated observations are necessary during our studies of the
Moon.  These two observations as well as the two that Mr. Hill did in 1966 are
perfect examples why.

Brightest Planetary in the Strongman

NGC 6210

  Now that summer is winding down in the northern hemisphere, we are approaching the
time when the constellation Hercules is getting lower in the western sky after
evening twilight. Soon it will be too low for ideal evening observation until next
year. Of the three brightest planetaries in Hercules, the one that wins out is NGC
6210. This little bluish planetary nebula is easily located south of the keystone
and glows at magnitude 8.8. The nebula appears slightly elongated in the east-west
direction and sports a 12.5 magnitude central star. The diameter appears to be
about 13” of arc and with a narrow band filter just a bit larger. This planetary
is estimated to be about 6500 light years away.
  
  Sketching:
  
  Date and Time: 9-12-2007, 2:10-2:40 UT
  Scope: 10” f/5.7 Dobsonian. 21mm and 12mm eyepieces 70x and 121x
  8”x12” white sketching paper, B, 2B graphite pencils, scanned and inverted, star
  magnitude adjustments using Paint
  Averted vision was a very useful aid in this sketch.
  Seeing: Pickering 8/10
  Transparency: above average 4/5
  Nelm: 4.9
  
  Frank McCabe